Roots Analysis has done a detailed study on Cell Therapy Manufacturing Market (3rd Edition), 2019 - 2030, covering various important aspects of the industry and identifying key future growth opportunities.
To order this 550+ page report, which features 160+ figures and 250+ tables, please visit this link
Key Market Insights
- More than 100 industry players and over 60 non-industry players currently claim to manufacture different types of cell therapies, either for in-house requirements or on contract basis
- The market is fragmented, featuring both established players and new entrants, which claim to operate at various scales and manufacture a diverse range of cell therapies
- In order to cater to the growing needs of clients / sponsors, companies have established presence across different regions; presently, the US, the UK and China are the key hubs for cell therapy manufacturing
- In recent years, a significant increase in partnership activity has been observed in this domain; in fact, therapy developers have already inked manufacturing deals with both indigenous and international experts
- In order to enhance core competencies related to the domain, both drug developers and CMOs are actively investing in expanding their existing infrastructure and capabilities
- Cell therapy manufacturers are also gradually opting to automate various operations in the supply chain; the primary objective is to achieve favorable bench-to-clinic timelines and cut down on production related losses
- Currently, the installed global capacity for cell therapy manufacturing is estimated to be spread across 2+ million square feet of dedicated cleanroom area distributed across various scales of operation
- More than 70,000 patients were estimated to have been enrolled in cell therapy related clinical trials; the demand for cell therapies is anticipated to grow significantly over the next decade
- Revenues from manufacturing operations of T-cell therapies are anticipated to capture higher market share; the benefit will be realized by both autologous and allogeneic therapies across different regions the world
- Clinical scale manufacturing operations are likely to drive the future market size, taking into consideration both in-house and contract service requirements
For more information, please visit https://www.rootsanalysis.com/reports/view_document/cell-therapy-manufacturing/285.html
Table of Contents
- PREFACE
1.1. Scope of the Report
1.2. Research Methodology
1.3. Chapter Outlines
- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- INTRODUCTION
3.1. Context and Background
3.2. Introduction to Cell Therapies
3.2.1. Comparison of Cell Therapies and Other Biotechnology Products
3.2.2. Classification of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs)
3.2.3. Current Market Landscape of ATMPs
3.3. Overview of Cell Therapy Manufacturing
3.4. Cell Therapy Manufacturing Models
3.4.1. Centralized Manufacturing
3.4.2. Decentralized Manufacturing
3.5. Scalability of Cell Therapy Manufacturing
3.5.1. Scale-up
3.5.2. Scale-out
3.6. Types of Cell Therapy Manufacturers
3.7. Key Manufacturing-related Challenges
3.8. Factors Influencing Cell Therapy Manufacturing
3.9. Automating Cell Therapy Manufacturing
3.10. Cell Therapy Manufacturing Supply Chain
3.11. Future Perspectives
- MARKET OVERVIEW
4.1. Chapter Overview
4.2. Cell Therapy Manufacturers (Industry Players): Overall Market Landscape
4.2.1. Analysis by Location of Headquarters
4.2.2. Analysis by Location of Manufacturing Facility
4.2.3. Analysis by Type of Cells Manufactured
4.2.4. Analysis by Source of Cells
4.2.5. Analysis by Scale of Operation
4.2.6. Analysis by Type of Cell Culture
4.2.7. Analysis by Purpose of Production
4.2.8. Analysis by Manufacturing Capabilities / Services
4.3. Cell Therapy Manufacturers (Non-Industry Players): Overall Market Landscape
4.3.1. Analysis by Location of Headquarters
4.3.2. Analysis by Location of Manufacturing Facility
4.3.3. Analysis by Type of Cells Manufactured
4.3.4. Analysis by Source of Cells
4.3.5. Analysis by Scale of Operation
4.3.6. Analysis by Type of Cell Culture
4.3.7. Analysis by Purpose of Production
4.3.8. Analysis by Manufacturing Capabilities / Services
4.4. Cell Therapy Manufacturing: Role of Logistics Service Providers
- REGULATORY LANDSCAPE
5.1. Chapter Overview
5.2. Current Scenario
5.2.1. Regulatory Guidelines in the US
5.2.2. Regulatory Guidelines in Europe
5.2.3. Regulatory Guidelines in Japan
5.2.4. Conditional Approvals
5.3. Regulatory Accreditations for Cell Therapy Manufacturing
5.3.1. Facilities Approved by Regulators to Manufacture Cell Therapies
5.4. Summary of Guidelines for Clinical-Stage Manufacturing of Cell Therapies
5.5. Existing Challenges to Clinical-Stage Manufacturing
5.5.1. Variability in Regulatory Guidelines across Different Geographies
5.6. Conclusion
- ROADMAPS FOR OVERCOMING EXISTING CHALLENGES
6.1. Chapter Overview
6.2. Roadmap for the US
6.2.1. Cell Processing
6.2.2. Cell Preservation, Distribution and Handling
6.2.3. Process Automation and Data Analytics
6.2.4. Process Monitoring and Quality Control
6.2.5. Standardization and Regulatory Support
6.2.6. Workforce Development
6.2.7. Supply Chain and Logistics
6.3. Roadmaps for Other Geographies
6.3.1. Europe
6.3.2. Asia Pacific
- AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR CELL THERAPY MANUFACTURING
7.1. Chapter Overview
7.2. Automation of Cell Therapy Manufacturing Processes
7.2.1. Closed Systems
7.2.2. Single-use Systems
7.2.3. Modular Systems
7.3. Case Studies
7.3.1. Roadmap to Developing an Automated Cell Manufacturing / Processing Device
7.3.2. Automating Cell Therapy Manufacturing
7.4. GMP-in-a-Box
7.5. List of Automation Service Providers
7.6. Comparative Analysis of Manual and Automated Processes
7.7. Concluding Remarks
- PROFILES: INDUSTRY PLAYERS
8.1. Chapter Overview
8.2. Service Providers in the US
8.2.1 Cognate BioServices
8.2.1.1. Company Overview
8.2.1.2. Service Portfolio
8.2.1.3. Manufacturing Capabilities
8.2.1.4. Partnerships
8.2.1.5. Future Outlook
8.2.2. FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics
8.2.2.1. Company Overview
8.2.2.2. Service Portfolio
8.2.2.3. Manufacturing Capabilities
8.2.2.4. Partnerships
8.2.2.5. Future Outlook
8.2.3. KBI Biopharma
8.2.3.1. Company Overview
8.2.3.2. Service Portfolio
8.2.3.3. Manufacturing Capabilities
8.2.3.4. Partnerships
8.2.3.5. Future Outlook
8.2.4. Hitachi Chemical Advanced Therapeutics Solutions
8.2.4.1. Company Overview
8.2.4.2. Service Portfolio
8.2.4.3. Manufacturing Capabilities
8.2.4.4. Partnerships
8.2.4.5. Future Outlook
8.2.5. Waisman Biomanufacturing
8.2.5.1. Company Overview
8.2.5.2. Service Portfolio
8.2.5.3. Manufacturing Capabilities
8.2.5.4. Partnerships
8.2.5.5. Future Outlook
8.3. Service Providers in Europe
8.3.1. BioNTech Innovative Manufacturing Services
8.3.1.1. Company Overview
8.3.1.2. Service Portfolio
8.3.1.3. Manufacturing Capabilities
8.3.1.4. Partnerships
8.3.1.5. Future Outlook
8.3.2. Cell and Gene Therapy Catapult
8.3.2.1. Company Overview
8.3.2.2. Service Portfolio
8.3.2.3. Manufacturing Capabilities
8.3.2.4. Partnerships
8.3.2.5. Future Outlook
8.3.3. Lonza
8.3.3.1. Company Overview
8.3.3.2. Service Portfolio
8.3.3.3. Manufacturing Capabilities
8.3.3.4. Partnerships
8.3.3.5. Future Outlook
8.3.4. MaSTherCell
8.3.4.1. Company Overview
8.3.4.2. Service Portfolio
8.3.4.3. Manufacturing Capabilities
8.3.4.4. Partnerships
8.3.4.5. Future Outlook
8.3.5. Roslin Cell Therapies
8.3.5.1. Company Overview
8.3.5.2. Service Portfolio
8.3.5.3. Manufacturing Capabilities
8.3.5.4. Partnerships
8.3.5.5. Future Outlook
8.4. Service Providers in Asia Pacific
8.4.1. Cell Therapies
8.4.1.1. Company Overview
8.4.1.2. Service Portfolio
8.4.1.3. Manufacturing Capabilities
8.4.1.4. Partnerships
8.4.1.5. Future Outlook
8.4.2. Japan Tissue Engineering (J-TEC)
8.4.2.1. Company Overview
8.4.2.2. Service Portfolio
8.4.2.3. Manufacturing Capabilities
8.4.2.4. Partnerships
8.4.2.5. Future Outlook
8.4.3. MEDINET
8.4.3.1. Company Overview
8.4.3.2. Service Portfolio
8.4.3.3. Manufacturing Capabilities
8.4.3.4. Partnerships
8.4.3.5. Future Outlook
8.4.4. Nikon CeLL innovation
8.4.4.1. Company Overview
8.4.4.2. Service Portfolio
8.4.4.3. Manufacturing Capabilities
8.4.4.4. Partnerships
8.4.4.5. Future Outlook
8.4.5. WuXi Advanced Therapies
8.4.5.1. Company Overview
8.4.5.2. Service Portfolio
8.4.5.3. Manufacturing Capabilities
8.4.5.4. Partnerships
8.4.5.5. Future Outlook
- PROFILES: NON-INDUSTRY PLAYERS
9.1. Chapter Overview
9.2. Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine
9.2.1. Overview
9.2.2. Operating Segments
9.2.3. Service Portfolio
9.2.4. Manufacturing Facilities and Capabilities
9.3. Centre for Cell Manufacturing Ireland, National University of Ireland
9.3.1. Overview
9.3.2. Service Portfolio
9.3.3. Manufacturing Facilities and Capabilities
9.4. Clinical Cell and Vaccine Production Facility, University of Pennsylvania
9.4.1. Overview
9.4.2. Service Portfolio
9.4.3. Manufacturing Facilities and Capabilities
9.5. Guy’s and St. Thomas’ GMP Facility, Guy’s Hospital
9.5.1. Overview
9.5.2. Service Portfolio
9.5.3. Manufacturing Facilities and Capabilities
9.6. Laboratory for Cell and Gene Medicine, Stanford University
9.6.1. Overview
9.6.2. Service Portfolio
9.6.3. Manufacturing Facilities and Capabilities
9.7. Molecular and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Minnesota
9.7.1. Overview
9.7.2. Service Portfolio
9.7.3. Manufacturing Facilities and Capabilities
9.8. Newcastle Cellular Therapies Facility, Newcastle University
9.8.1. Overview
9.8.2. Service Portfolio
9.8.3. Manufacturing Facilities and Capabilities
9.9. Rayne Cell Therapy Suite, King’s College London
9.9.1. Overview
9.9.2. Manufacturing Facilities and Capabilities
9.10. Scottish National Blood Transfusion Services Cellular Therapy Facility, Scottish Centre for Regenerative Medicine
9.10.1. Overview
9.10.2. Manufacturing Facilities and Capabilities
9.11. Sydney Cell and Gene Therapy
9.11.1. Overview
9.11.2. Manufacturing Facilities and Capabilities
- ROLE OF NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS
10.1. Chapter Overview
10.2. Cell Therapy Manufacturing Service Providers: Non-Profit Organizations
10.2.1. CellCAN
10.2.2. Cell Therapy Manufacturing Cooperative Research Center (CTM CRC)
10.2.3. National Cell Manufacturing Consortium (NCMC)
10.2.4. California Institute of Regenerative Medicine (CIRM)
10.3. Cell Therapy Manufacturing: Affiliated International Societies
- PARTNERSHIPS
11.1. Chapter Overview
11.2. Partnership Models
11.3. Cell Therapy Manufacturing: List of Partnerships
11.3.1. Analysis by Year of Partnership
11.3.2. Analysis by Type of Partnership Model
11.3.3. Analysis by Year and Type of Partnership Model
11.4. Analysis by Type of Cells
11.5. Analysis by Scale of Operation
11.6. Geographical Analysis
11.6.1. Continent-wise Distribution
11.6.2. Country-wise Distribution
11.7. Most Active Players: Analysis by Number of Partnerships
11.8. Cell Therapy Manufacturing: List of Acquisitions
11.8.1. Analysis by Year and Type of Cells
11.8.2. Geographical Analysis
11.8.3. Ownership Change Matrix
- FACILITY EXPANSIONS
12.1. Chapter Overview
12.2. Cell Therapy Manufacturing: List of Expansions
12.2.1. Cumulative Year-wise Distribution
12.2.2. Analysis by Type of Cells
12.2.3. Analysis by Scale of Operation
12.2.3. Analysis by Purpose of Expansion
12.2.4. Analysis by Location of Manufacturing Facility
12.2.5. Analysis by Region and Purpose of Expansion
- CAPACITY ANALYSIS
13.1. Chapter Overview
13.2. Key Assumptions and Methodology (Industry Players)
13.2.1 Cell Therapy Manufacturing: Installed Global Capacity (Number of Cleanrooms)
13.2.1.1. Analysis by Size of Manufacturer
13.2.1.2. Analysis by Scale of Operation
13.2.1.3. Analysis by Location of Manufacturing Facility
13.2.2. Cell Therapy Manufacturing: Installed Global Capacity (Cleanroom Area)
13.2.2.1. Analysis by Size of Manufacturer
13.2.2.2. Analysis by Scale of Operation
13.2.2.3. Analysis by Location of Manufacturing Facility
13.3. Key Assumptions and Methodology (Non-Industry Players)
13.3.1. Cell Therapy Manufacturing: Installed Global Capacity (Number of Cleanrooms)
13.3.1.1. Analysis by Scale of Operation
13.3.1.2. Analysis by Location of Manufacturing Facility
13.3.2. Cell Therapy Manufacturing: Installed Global Capacity (Cleanroom Area)
13.3.2.1. Analysis by Scale of Operation
13.3.2.2. Analysis by Location of Manufacturing Facility
13.4 Concluding Remarks
- DEMAND ANALYSIS
14.1 Chapter Overview
14.2 Key Assumptions and Methodology
14.3 Cell Therapy Manufacturing: Overall Annual Demand
14.3.1. Analysis by Type of Cells
14.3.2. Analysis by Scale of Operations
14.3.3. Analysis by Geography
- COST PRICE ANALYSIS
15.1. Chapter Overview
15.2. Factors Contributing to the High Price of Cell Therapies
15.3. Pricing Models for Cell Therapies
15.3.1. Based on Associated Costs for T-cell Therapies
15.3.2. Based on Associated Costs for Stem Cell Therapies
15.3.3. Based on Availability of Competing Products
15.3.4. Based on Target Patient Segment
15.3.5. Based on Opinions of Industry Experts
15.4. Cell Therapy Cost Optimization
15.4.1. Role of Cost of Goods Sold
15.4.2. Role of Automation
15.4.3. Role of Cell Therapy Contract Manufacturing Organizations
15.5. Reimbursement-related Considerations for Cell Therapies
15.5.1. Case Study: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence’s (NICE) Appraisal of CAR-T Therapies
Contact Details
Gaurav Chaudhary
+1 (415) 800 3415
Roots Analysis has announced the addition of “In Silico / Computer-Aided Drug Discovery Services Market: Focus on Large Molecules (Antibodies, Proteins, Peptides, Nucleic Acid, Gene Therapy and Vectors), 2020-2030 (Including Structure Based Drug Discovery, Fragment Based Drug Discovery, Ligand Based Drug Discovery, Target Based Drug Discovery / Multi-Target Drug Design, Interface Based Drug Discovery, Approaches)” report to its list of offerings.
Presently, in silico tools / approaches are available for the identification, selection and optimization of pharmacological leads.
in fact, the predictive power of such solutions has been demonstrated to enable researchers to bypass the traditional experimental screening of billions of molecules against hundreds of biological targets, thereby, allowing significant reductions in the investment of both time and resources.
It is worth mentioning that about 30% of players presently offer end-to-end drug discovery services Over 150 software solutions are currently available for use in drug discovery Around 90 companies are currently providing software tools, web applications and other technology platforms for drug discovery.
Examples of popular softwares include (in alphabetical order) FORECASTER SUITE, MOPAC2016™, PKPlus™, REAL Space Navigator, SaaS Platform and VolSurf+.
Around 40% of the companies claim to specialize in antibodies, proteins and peptidesWithin the antibodies segment, nearly 60% of in silico service offerings are focused on the discovery of monoclonal antibodies.
Therefore, the use of technology can save time and money, while providing a far better understanding of the relationships between different formulations and processes parameters.Key Drivers, Restraints, and Opportunities of AI in Pharma and Biotech MarketAdoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in the drug discovery market in developing regions such as APAC is increasing, thanks to the expansion of pharmaceutical industries by collaborating with other industries and rise in demand to reduce drug discovery time.
Furthermore, the expansion of biotechnology industries is estimated to offer significant opportunities for the market.An estimated 50% of U.S. citizens are affected by at least one chronic condition; consequently, the pharmaceutical segment of the healthcare industry is projected to be positively impacted by the expected trend of AI adoption.All top 10 so-called giant pharma companies (namely Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Merck, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Johnson & Johnson) have either expressly collaborated with or acquired AI technologies to take advantage of the opportunities AI brings to the table.
Industry leaders are presently focused on the development of more efficient methods, and machine learning is emerging as a possible solution.The current machine learning initiatives of the top five pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies reveal trends within the following areas:Digital coaching solutions – Utilization of web-based technologies to simulate one-on-one coaching sessions so that all patients can have the benefit of a uniquely devised medication program.For instance: Johnson & Johnson’s Patient Athlete programPersonalized medicine – Personalized medicine, also called precision medicine, maybe a medical model that separates people into different groups—with medical decisions, practices, interventions, and/or products being tailored to the individual patient supported their predicted response or risk of disease.For instance.
Unlike other applications within healthcare facilities, drug discovery seems to own a clearer path to adoption.Recently, robots became more collaborative with humans and are more easily trained by moving them through the desired task.
Over time, it seems likely that an equivalent improvement in intelligence that we have seen in other areas of AI would be incorporated into physical robots.Surgical robots initially approved in the U.S. in 2000, provided ‘superpowers’ to surgeons, improving their ability to examine, create precise and minimally invasive incisions, and stitch wounds.
Common surgical procedures using robotic surgery include gynecologic surgery, prostate surgery, and head and neck surgery.Pre Book Ai In Pharma And Biotech Market Report – https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/checkout.php?rep_id=79399=S North America to Capture Major Share of Global Market of AI in Pharma & BiotechNorth America is expected to account for a major share of the global market of AI in Pharma and Biotech due to the high prevalence of chronic diseases among the population.
Softcon Systems brings you automation solutions specific to the pharmaceutical industry – we will work with you to develop and implement ideal solutions specific to your requirements.
Automation at every point of the value chain will enable the pharma companies to get pharmaceuticals from the lab to the patient more quickly.We design systems that help pharmaceutical and biotech companies to achieve operational excellence, reduce time to market and meet all industry standards and regulations.
