Rishabh Gandhi being an Arbitrator and Mediator enrolled with the Mediation and Conciliation Project Committee of the Supreme Court of India has showcased his potential to work as an independent person to resolve a dispute. Rishabh Gandhi and its team’s recognized work make the lawyers of the firm as one of the best Arbitration Lawyers in Pune. The Firms ethical practices and expertise have made RGAA the first choice of the clients as an Arbitrator and Mediator. For more details you can write to [email protected] or call on +91 9075281109 or visit here http://rgaa.co.in/
Rishabh Gandhi and Advocates is among the Top 10 Corporate Law Firms in Pune.
RGAA team is of highly qualified advocates and has made the Firm one of the top law firms in Pune.
The firm is also featured in 10 Most Promising Corporate Legal Consultants of India by Silicon India Magazine in 2018.RGAA strives to fulfil the needs of the client efficiently and economically.
RGAA has a bright past as a Corporate Law firm in Pune.
All the efforts of the firm isto provide a fair service which have tagged them with the title of the best law firm in Pune.
For more details you can write to or call RGAA @ [email protected] / +91 9075281109
All the allegations by the opposition have fallen by the way side as the Supreme Court set aside the review petition on Rafale deal.
Now, it has set aside the review petition once again offering its observations on pricing and government’s decision-making process.
These are the areas that the petitioners and the oppositions have raised doubts.
These important observations taken as excerpts from the judgement copy are provided here.
“Insofar as the aspect of pricing is concerned, the Court satisfied itself with the material made available.
It is not the function of this Court to determine the prices nor for that matter can such aspects be dealt with on mere suspicion of persons who decide to approach the Court.
The Supreme Court dismissed the bail application of a petitioner, who is an Officer of the office of the Alipore District Judge’s Court, accused of floating a tender without the permission of the District Judge.
During the investigation, it has been found that there were no supplies but entries were affected in the documents of the office.
The Counsel, appearing for the State of West Bengal, opposed the bail application and submitted that the petitioner is not cooperating with the investigation.
Whereas the Counsel, appearing for the petitioner, submitted that he needs time to file a rejoinder.Read More....
Facebook these days printed the first 20 participants of its Oversight Board, an impartial physique that can pass by judgement on Facebook‘s policies, aid in content material moderation, and hear appeals on current decisions.
In theory, it’s a committee that can assist Facebook navigate hard selections of what’s ok to have on the platform, and can overrule even CEO Mark Zuckerberg.
It’ll additionally be funded by way of an impartial $130 million trust.
The board will hear instances in five-person panels and make closing rulings, announcing on its website online that “Facebook have to put in force our decisions, until implementation should violate the law.”Zuckerberg stated in 2018 that the unbiased board would “be centered solely on our community,” adding: “The reason of this physique would be to uphold the precept of giving human beings a voice whilst additionally recognizing the truth of maintaining human beings safe.”In an op-ed for the New York Times, the 4 co-chairs of the board specify that they won’t always be managing each and every attraction or coverage choice to do with Facebook:We will center of attention on figuring out instances that have a real-world impact, are essential for public discourse and increase questions about modern Facebook policies.
But, whilst they don’t say it in so many words, one may want to infer they don’t suppose Facebook should be tons worse off for their assist than it is now.The human beings who’ve as a result a long way been chosen to be on the board have a plethora of tiers and skills that make them perfect for judging subtle social situations.
They consist of the former Prime Minister of Denmark, Nobel Peace Prize and Pulitzer recipients, contributors of worldwide advocacy groups, and more than one regulation professors.
The Supreme Court, on Monday, has continued its suo moto scorn continuing against Advocate on-Record Lawyer Prashant Bhushan, over a solicitation made by the senior supporter Harish Salve.
Prashant Bhushan prestigious for showing up in Public Interest Litigations have grumbled about the record of his remarks made against previous Chief Justice SH Kapadia.