logo
logo
Sign in

Poly Voyager 5200 Uc Vs. Yealink WH63 In Depth Review + Mic Test VIDEO

avatar
Noa Roy
Poly Voyager 5200 Uc Vs. Yealink WH63 In Depth Review + Mic Test VIDEO
 

Poly Voyager 5200 UC have been well known for a long while, and that ubiquity has just expanded since the Coronavirus pandemic which saw incalculable individuals working distantly Plantronics Voyager 5200 UC Headset.
 
Poly Voyager 5200 Remote headsets by and large, arrive in a wide combination of styles and types. These headsets are presented by a few makers with some being notable like Poly and Jabra, with different suppliers being less known like Yealink, Find, Logitech and others.
 
Regardless of whether a remote headset is being given by a known maker or not, doesn't actually make any difference nowadays. There are a ton of extraordinary remote headsets to look over Plantronics Voyager 5200 UC
 
In this blog, I'm going to exhibit two famous models, and simultaneously, perceive how they look at against one another. In particular, I'll do a one next to the other survey of the Poly Explorer 5200 UC and the Yealink WH63 remote headsets Voyager 5200 UC
 
poly explorer 5200 uc
 
Front and center, realize that however these two headsets are remote, they do contrast in their remote innovation, and what they can, and can't interface with. I'll expand further on this as we go through this item examination.
 
Before I get everything rolling with my survey, I needed to tell you that I shot a Youtube video of this item correlation. A many individuals like to watch video content over understanding it. Generally, I'm the very same way.
 
In this way, in the event that you're of a comparable attitude, make a point to look at my survey video. I'll post it promptly beneath so you can get to it without any problem.
 
To start things off permit me to say that both of these remote headsets are excellent items. In light of what they were intended to do, they perform well indeed. So, there are contrasts between these two models, so how about we perceive how they stack up.
 
Chapter by chapter list
 
What remote innovation do these headsets utilize?
 
The Poly Explorer 5200 UC uses Bluetooth 5.0 remote innovation. This is very normal to numerous remote Bluetooth gadgets, and it addresses the most recent in the Bluetooth development.
 
The Explorer 5200 UC can match up remotely with your Bluetooth-empowered cell phones, and to a PC by means of the BT600 Dongle/Connector.
 
A few PCs are Bluetooth empowered and may take into account the 5200 UC to associate remotely, however you'll likely not get steady execution from that association which is the reason the BT600 Dongle/Connector is suggested, and by and large, required.
 
On the other hand, the Yealink WH63 uses DECT 6.0 remote innovation. When contrasting DECT innovation with Bluetooth, you'll discover a few contrasts. A portion of these distinctions might serve your requirements better, or they may not, contingent upon what your particular necessities are. I'll develop this further as we travel through this survey, yet in short:

DECT will give you longer remote reach when contrasted with Bluetooth
 
DECT is intended to work basically with telephones, and not cell phones.
 
Bluetooth is intended to work with cell phones, and PCs
 
DECT is known to give better, more steady voice quality
 
DECT headsets regularly offer more long periods of talk time over Bluetooth.
 
In case you are intrigued to find out about the critical contrasts between DECT 6.0 and Bluetooth advances, you can learn more by looking at this post which remembers a short video for the subject.
 
What do every one of these two headsets interface with?
 
The Poly Explorer 5200 UC is intended to associate with your cell phones, for example, to your cell phone, tablet or other Bluetooth empowered gadgets. It can likewise interface with a PC through Bluetooth, or by means of the included USB Dongle.
 
The Yealink WH63 is intended to associate with Work area Telephones, for example, Yealink models, or select Polycom VVX models that have a USB port. It can likewise associate with a PC by means of
 
the included USB link. The WH63 isn't intended to work with cell phones, so no association with your cell phone or tablet for instance.
 
On account of these immense contrasts in availability, your requirements ought to be painstakingly assessed with the goal that you can settle on an educated headset purchasing choice. The last thing you need is to purchase another remote headset just to find that it doesn't interface with your gadget.
 
How do the batteries analyze?
 
The Poly Explorer 5200 UC has a battery that is appraised to give as long as 7 hours of talk time. For a great many people, 7 hours is adequate to get them as the day progressed, even a bustling one.
 
On the off chance that that 7 hours ends up being trying to the individuals who are power clients, then, at that point, the arrangement is place the headset into the charging support when enjoying reprieves, and during the lunch time frame. By doing this, you ought to have the option to broaden the measure of talk time to work out positively past the 7 hour mark.
 
Concerning the battery substitution, lamentably, it's not ready to be supplanted by the client. This implies that when the battery no longer holds a charge, the headset should be supplanted.
 
This is a not so great plan, yet no question there were reasons, possibly acceptable ones, for planning it along these lines. To be reasonable, numerous remote headsets have batteries that can't be traded out by the client. So this is definitely not something surprising.
 
Concerning the Yealink WH63, it gives as long as 8 hours of talk time, and like the Explorer 5200 UC, the battery isn't client replaceable by the same token.
 
One factor that assumes a part in how long you may anticipate that a battery should last is the amount you use it. The individuals who may be alluded to as a force client, that is, weighty clients, may view that the battery should be supplanted sooner when contrasted with the people who utilize the headset less. A great many people ought to hope to get around 2 years of utilization before the headset should be supplanted.
 
What are the accessible wearing styles for every headset?
 
The Poly Explorer 5200 UC gives just one wearing style, which is finished/in the ear. It has an earpiece that folds over the ear with ear gels that come in different sizes that are embedded into the ear. You don't have the choice to wear this headset in some other manner. It permits you to wear it on the right or left ear.
 
The Yealink WH63 is a convertible-type headset. By this I mean, it tends to be worn in an assortment of designs, or changed over starting with one style then onto the next.
 
Included with the WH63 are:
 
Over the ear with the included ear circle
 
In the ear with the included, different sizes of ear gels
 
Over the ear and in the ear when utilizing the ear entwine and ear gels 4. Over the head with the included headband
 
Behind the neck, with the discretionary necklace
 
As should be obvious, there's a great deal of contrasts between the Poly Explorer 5200 UC, and the Yealink WH63 wearing styles. The Explorer 5200 is restricted to one style in particular, though the Yealink WH63 gives you a few distinctive wearing choices.
 
What amount do these headsets gauge?
 
There's no considerable contrast in weight between these two remote headsets.
 
The Poly Explorer 5200 UC gauges .67 ounces
 
The Yealink WH63 gauges .7 ounces
 
As should be obvious, the weight is basically something very similar, and by headset guidelines, thought about lightweight and accordingly, agreeable for the entire day use.
 
What about the remote reach, how would they analyze?
 
Any individual who's hoping to get associated up with a remote headset certainly has interest in the accessible remote reach they may hope to get. All things considered, that is one reason to go remote in any case; cutting the rope and having the option to move uninhibitedly rope free.
 
Anyway, what amount of remote reach may you expect if the Poly Explorer 5200 UC is on your short rundown? Up to 50 feet.
 
On the off chance that up to 50 feet is satisfactory for your needs and needs, this remote headset, expecting it associates with your gadgets, may be the ideal fit for you. What's more, in our remote reach test, that can be found in my video, the Explorer 5200 UC followed through on that 50 feet of remote reach.
 
Concerning the Yealink WH63, it's appraised to furnish you with up to 300 feet of remote reach. As should be obvious, this model is intended to give undeniably more remote talk range over the Explorer 5200 UC. This is on the grounds that it works off of DECT 6.0 and not Bluetooth like the 5200 does.
 
A DECT signal is more grounded, and fit for conveying more talk range over Bluetooth. In our trial of the WH63, it gave a decent 175 feet of reach before the sound quality started to fall flat.
 
The Yealink WH63 as noted before, interfaces with Yealink and Polycom VVX telephones that have a USB port, just as to a PC. Thus, assuming that is the thing that you're hoping to interface with, you ought to hope to get around 150+ feet of remote talk range.
 
Our typical view on remote reach is take the producer's expressed reach, and cut it down the middle, and that should give you a nearer gauge of remote reach you ought to anticipate.
 
In our Yealink WH63 remote reach test, it followed precisely that way. Something to remember while assessing any remote headset.
 
Sound quality – How would they sound?
 
Regardless of the amount you're hoping to spend on another remote headset, you need it to sound great. Poly, in the past Plantronics, has gained notoriety for making extraordinary sounding headsets.
 
Yealink, then again, is new to the headset game, so they're insight and notoriety in the business is lesser known. That doesn't make the Yealink WH63 an awful sounding headset. A remarkable opposite.
 
In our tests, the Poly Explorer 5200 UC sounded great, and worked really hard to dispose of undesirable foundation clamor. It permitted wind commotion to enter the discussion when we went outdoors.
 
Embedding a little windscreen over the finish of the receiver would almost certainly tackle that issue, yet many probably won't care for the manner in which it would look. However, in a commonplace office climate, or in the bounds of a car, the 5200 UC ought to give you superb sound quality.
 
The Yealink WH63 performed very well as far as decreasing undesirable foundation clamor. I for one felt that the wealth of sound was better on the Explorer 5200 UC, however both performed well in commotion decrease tests.
 
On the off chance that I needed to pick one for having the bett
collect
0
avatar
Noa Roy
guide
Zupyak is the world’s largest content marketing community, with over 400 000 members and 3 million articles. Explore and get your content discovered.
Read more