Many privacy advocates oppose Prop 24, which would buttress consumer privacy.
Headset’s Facebook-login requirement may fall afoul of GDPR’s “coupling ban.”
Instead of forcing a sale to a US company like Microsoft or Oracle, Trump should be trying to use the TikTok battle to lead on global data privacy.
There's rain in the forecast for this privacy parade.
Brush up on your data security and protection skills in our upcoming show Webcast  If ever there was a convenient push to move stragglers into the cloud, the COVID-19 coronavirus has provided that impetus.…
Very few SaaS vendors actually offer anything in the way of data protection against major attacks.
First Safe Harbor gone, now its replacement... Schrems the breaks! The long-running kerfuffle over the so-called Privacy Shield EU-US data protection agreement took another lurch this week after politicos announced plans to ponder an "enhancement" to the framework.…
British police used facial recognition unlawfully, the Court of Appeal ruled today, in a landmark decision that could have a big impact on the technology’s use in the UK. The judgment stems from a complaint by Cardiff resident Ed Bridges, who said police had scanned his face while he was Christmas shopping, and again when he was at a protest. Bridges argued that South Wales Police (SWP) had breached his right to privacy, as well as equality and data protection laws. But last September, the UK‘s Supreme Court ruled against him, claiming cops had followed the relevant rules and met the requirements of… This story continues at The Next Web
COVID-battered businesses win reprieve from Information Commissioner's Office British Airways expects the fine for its 2018 credit card data leak to be just 10.8 per cent of the original £183m proposed by the UK data watchdog – while US hotel chain Marriott has both halved and kicked its own data protection fine into the long grass once again, The Register can reveal.…
Twitter is under investigation by the FTC and could face a fine of anywhere between $150 million to $250 million, the company disclosed in a regulatory filing Monday. Twitter said the FTC notified it of allegations that it improperly targeted ads at users based on information they had provided for "safety and security purposes," in violation a 2011 agreement. Twitter admitted last year that it had "inadvertently" targeted users with ads based on information they had provided to better secure their accounts. The company's privacy and security practices have come under renewed scrutiny following a major hack last month that resulted in dozens of high-profile accounts being compromised. Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories. Twitter disclosed in a regulatory filing Monday that it is under investigation by the Federal Trade Commission related to allegations that it violated a 2011 consent agreement  — and that it's expecting a "probable loss" of somewhere between $150 million and $250 million. "Following the announcement of our Q2 financial results, we received a draft complaint from the FTC alleging violations of our 2011 consent order. Following standard accounting rules we included an estimated range for settlement in our 10Q filed on August 3," a Twitter spokesperson told Business Insider. A spokesperson for the FTC declined to comment. The FTC's complaint specifically centers on Twitter's alleged use of "phone number and/or email address data provided for safety and security purposes for targeted advertising during periods between 2013 and 2019," according to the filing. Twitter said in the filing that it had set aside $150 million to cover a potential fine from the FTC, noting that "the matter remains unresolved, and there can be no assurance as to the timing or the terms of any final outcome." Last October, Twitter admitted that it had used phone numbers and emails — which users had uploaded with the intention of securing their accounts with two-factor authentication — in order to target them with ads. Twitter said the data had been used "inadvertently" and that it didn't know how many people had been affected. In the complaint, the FTC alleges that incident put Twitter in violation of a agreement it reached with the agency in 2011, which was part of a settlement of charges that the company "deceived consumers and put their privacy at risk by failing to safeguard their personal information." As part of that settlement, the FTC barred Twitter "from misleading consumers about the extent to which it protects the security, privacy, and confidentiality" of their private information, and it also required Twitter to implement a "comprehensive information security program" subject to independent audit every other year. Twitter is facing renewed scrutiny surrounding its security measures following a major hack last month where employees were tricked into giving hackers access to internal tools that allowed them to hijack dozens of high-profile accounts including those of Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Elon Musk, Kanye West, Apple, and Uber. The hackers then used the accounts to orchestrate a cryptocurrency scam that netted them at least $120,000. Three individuals have been arrested in connection with the incident.Join the conversation about this story » NOW WATCH: A cleaning expert reveals her 3-step method for cleaning your entire home quickly
"Shifting the processing of personal data to these complex and sometimes opaque systems comes with inherent risks." The post ICO Warns on AI Data Compliance: Publishes New Auditing Framework appeared first on Computer Business Review.
Apple and Google have used online privacy and security measures to gain a competitive advantage, Congress members said.
'Exceptionally broad' demands reveal too much about our staff! American tech giants have enjoyed a reversal of their EU legal fortunes over the past fortnight as Euro nation courts issued rulings in their favor – and now Facebook has even sued the European Union itself, alleging the political bloc’s agencies broke their own data protection rules.…
Joe Biden's campaign told staffers to "refrain from using and downloading TikTok" on their personal and work phones, Bloomberg reported Monday. Biden's top lawyer told staffers in an email to avoid using the popular social media app due to security and privacy concerns, according to Bloomberg. TikTok has come under increasing scrutiny from US government officials who worry that its Chinese parent company ByteDance could cave to censorship or data requests from Beijing. Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories. Former Vice President Joe Biden's campaign told its staffers to avoid using popular social media app TikTok, Bloomberg reported Monday. Biden's general counsel, Dana Remus, told staffers in an email that they should "refrain from downloading and using TikTok on work and personal devices," citing concerns around data privacy and security, according to Bloomberg. TikTok, which is owned by the Beijing-based internet company ByteDance, has faced increasing scrutiny in the US from lawmakers as well as intelligence and military officials who worry that has the potential to be influenced by the Chinese government. The Guardian reported last year that internal documents instructed moderators to censor content that could anger Chinese officials, though TikTok said at the time that those policies are no longer in use. Following the report, top US senators called on intelligence agencies to investigate the app's connection to China and whether it poses national-security risks. Since then, the US military and several government agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security, have prohibited their troops and employees from using the app, and President Donald Trump has floated the idea of banning the app from operating in the US entirely — though he cited China's response to the coronavirus pandemic as his reason for wanting to curb its use. Trump officials have also claimed that TikTok's data collection practices pose privacy risks to users. While the company has faced repeated allegations that it fails to protect children's information, experts also told Business Insider that TikTok's privacy policy suggests companies like Facebook and Google are similarly intrusive.SEE ALSO: 14 major companies that have announced employees can work remotely long term Join the conversation about this story » NOW WATCH: What it's like inside North Korea's controversial restaurant chain