logo
logo
Sign in

Things you should know about Under Armour - 2022

avatar
fashion
Things you should know about Under Armour - 2022

Top companies today understand that it's not simply about who they are and what they do, in addition to the causes they support and the issues they resolve for their consumer engagement. Football players' damp, cumbersome, sweat-soaked T-shirts that prevented them from taking advantage of their performance led to the creation of Under Armour, a company that provides solutions to these issues. Kevin Plank, a former football player, was inspired by the wicking properties of fabrics used in women's undergarments to create a T-shirt that remained consistently dry and odor-free.


Kevin created a brand-new segment of athletic apparel by finding a solution to a widespread issue, and he now holds 75% of the customer base. As of late, Under Armour has expanded to include women and kids, and each new economy they enter resonates with their deliberate brand characteristics. In contrast to Lululemon, where the yoga mom brand identity does not translate for males, this situation is extremely opposite.'


Put function first

Under Armour is promoted as clothing that solves problems, as opposed to marketing a brand or a culture like Lululemon or Adidas. Under Armour is marketing functionality, if anything is flowing to keep exercise clothes clean and dry, pressure clothing to reduce pain, or a one-armed suit designed expressly to preserve a pitcher's forearm in great form for competition.


They have a clear edge over its competitors in a market where utility, cooperation, and efficiency are key factors. Under Armor also benefits from producing clothing as technology since, unlike fashion firms, things that do anything may be trademarked, giving them an advantage in safeguarding their concepts worldwide.


Place invention before image

The US women's gymnastics team is shown practicing before the Olympics in their ad "it's what you do in the dark that puts you in the light." Michael Phelps is featured in the 90-second commercial.


Additionally, UA positions itself as the brand that enables users to swim faster and jump higher with the help of their force of will and a little assistance from Under Armour's friends. Instead of sponsoring the games and advertising during them, UA uses the apparel worn in the games to tell its story and associate itself with the success of the players, putting it at the forefront of performance-boosting innovation.


Keep things basic and honest

Nike's ambitious "just do it" mantra was embraced by Under Armour by embracing the truth beneath its myth. It's not as easy as it seems to do things simply. There are always challenges we have to face and obstacles we have to overcome. With their clever and straightforward answers to any question, Under Armor is positioned as a brand that understands that nobody can be perfect, but that each of us has challenges to overcome. This reality-based approach serves as the foundation for their problem-solving strategy.


How morally sound is Under Armour?

Under Armour, an American activewear company that was established in 1996, has gradually expanded to become one of the major sportswear producers in the world, along with Adidas and Puma. 


With a quality management plan they neither realized they wanted nor are incapable of living devoid, the company, which promotes athletes like Michael Phelps, Steph Curry, and Lindsey Vonn, seeks to empower everyone. What about its effects on the environment, society, and animals? What effects do Under Armour's actions have on the planet and its inhabitants? How moral is Under Armour, we wonder?


Effect on the environment

There aren't many eco-friendly materials used by Under Armour. We couldn't find any proof that it reduces recyclability, takes significant steps to lessen or get rid of dangerous chemicals, or does water conservation projects. Polyester, a substance generated from hydrocarbons that often takes hundreds of decades to disintegrate, makes up the majority of Under Armour's apparel. The ecological rating of Under Armour is very insufficient due to all of these factors.


Working circumstances

Under Armour is graded as "Not Well Sufficient" in the labor department. Although some of its distribution chain (such as the penultimate point of growth) is FLA Workplace Code of Conduct approved, the company needs openness and obtained a score of 21-30% on the Fashion Transparency Index.


Yes, the public may receive information from Under Armour on its supplier policies, investigations, and corrective action methods. However, it omits information on forced labor, gender equality, or associational freedom. Additionally, we couldn't find any proof that it has any rules or protections in place to protect its suppliers and workers from the effects of COVID-19, let alone that it guarantees the payment of a livable wage throughout its supply chain!


Animal protection

No evidence exists that Under Armour has the policy to reduce the suffering of animals. Instead, it employs leather, wool, and down. It's "Not Good Enough"!


Overall Score

You might be wondering how moral Under Armour is. "Not Good Enough" describes Under Armour. Our investigation revealed that the American company does exceptionally little to lessen its environmental effect or guarantee the welfare and safety of the people in its supply chain. Under Armour could begin by providing more details about business policies and the effects they have, as well as making sure that a living wage is paid, to receive a higher rating.


Promote cruelty-free animal goods

The brand's support for cruelty-free animal goods is one more justification for its success. Some of Under Armour's garments do contain materials from animals. Particularly its footwear uses genuine leather. As a result of Under Armour's use of animal products, the company conducts thorough research for its partners. To conduct business with the company, its partners must adhere to a set of rules.


These requirements specifically make sure that ranchers treat their animals humanely and gather animal products without harming them. Under Armour will not collaborate with a supplier that doesn't uphold these requirements. Under Armour is an excellent brand to support if you're looking for one that promotes cruelty-free animal goods.



Conclusion

The athletic clothing company Under Armour specializes in producing higher gear that supports athletes. It's a better product since it understands what its clients need and want to address those issues. It also considers its environmental impact and uses sustainable production techniques as much as possible.



collect
0
avatar
fashion
guide
Zupyak is the world’s largest content marketing community, with over 400 000 members and 3 million articles. Explore and get your content discovered.
Read more