While hiring a commercial company for facility management can be very costly, it can be profitable in the end. Especially in today's bad economy, many businesses are trying to be cost-effective by reducing the management of facilities. Saving money is very tempting, but a quality facility management corporation is suitable for any industrial business.
By hiring a company that manages the facilities, a business will see that their customers and clients are more satisfied. Companies that actually care about their appearance are likely to have more first-time customers and more frequent customers than businesses that don't care about their appearance. A business always looks more respectable and professional when located on a tidy site. A quality commercial company that provides convenience management can save a business millions in the long run. While an industry can spend a lot of money on business benefits, this money is well spent. Constantly upgrading and repairing as needed reduces utility costs, relieves costly emergency service calls and even prevents litigation.
Maintaining benefits will help a business comply with official codes and laws. Every year, official standards for business are tightened. A corporation that provides facility management may be very aware of these changes, preventing any lawsuits. And if a lawsuit is raised, documentation from the corporation can be used to fight the lawsuit and prove that the company is willing to take all necessary steps to maintain a safe environment.
A business is more likely to have an environmentally friendly image if they hire a commercial corporation to manage the facilities. Consumers are more likely to buy from a business that takes many steps to conserve natural resources and reduce pollution. Many businesses have increased sales after achieving an eco-friendly image.
Productivity is likely to increase for an industrial business that hires a corporation to maintain the benefits. Employees will be willing to work harder in a safer, more comfortable environment. A good maintenance site will attract employees who are willing to work hard. The more labor is done in a short period of time, the less money is spent for labor. The facility will be able to prevent a business from getting a lawsuit by creating a safe environment with the help of maintenance corporations. Safe sites will reduce accidents, break-ins and violence. If someone is injured on the business site due to lack of up-to-date facilities, the business will be the target of many lawsuits.
Finally, a business is more likely to sell if the site is well maintained. Many people say that a house with a great lawn sells well. Well, the same idea can be applied to business. When someone wants to buy a business, they look better than that. While the benefits may be costly to maintain, they will ultimately pay for it in multiple ways in the future. Visit evbex.com for more information.
ISO 41001:2018 Facility Management System — Three years on — Problem solved or just another standard?In late 2018, the long-awaited International Standard Organization published ISO 41001:2018 — Facility Management system — Requirements with guidance for use.
Some two and a half years later, we look at whether it has been a success story or whether it has failed to live up to its pre-launch expectation.IntroductionThe questions I will answer are:Should we pursue ISO 41001 and become certified?What is the certification process and the stages involved?What are the benefits of certification and will it add value?
In Part 1, dated June 2019, I looked at early indicators of how the standard was received by the profession and industry, less than a year after it was launched.
At the time, I experienced varying opinions from around the Globe.
It was evident however that the ‘FM Mature’ countries were not adopting the standard as quickly as its pre-launch expectation suggested.
There were numerous reasons for this, mainly due to a) a lack of awareness of the standard; or b) organisations were already certified to any one of several other associated ISO Management System Standards (MSS), notably ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and ISO 45001 and that until they felt a need or were being persuaded that ISO 41001 was a must, they would refrain for the time being.
